It was possible, no doubt, to imagine a society in which wealth, in the sense of personal possessions and luxuries, should be evenly distributed, while power remained in the hands of a small privileged caste. But in practice such a society could not long remain stable. For if leisure and security were enjoyed by all alike, the great mass of human beings who are normally stupefied by poverty would become literate and would learn to think for themselves; and when once they had done this, they would sooner or later realise that the privileged minority had no function, and they would sweep it away. In the long run, a hierarchical society was only possible on a basis of poverty and ignorance. Emmanuel GoldsteinDA MENTALIDADE PEQUENO-BURGUESA E DAS LYNCH MOBS NO FACELOOK

O QUE LEVA MILHÕES DE PESSOAS A DENUNCIAR OS SEUS AMIGOS FACEBOOKIANOS

É UMA MORALZINHA DE TRAZER POR CASA?

QUEM NÃO TEM TELEMÓVEL NÃO PODE TER PERFIL?

ESTAS E MUITAS OUTRAS PERGUNTAS

NUMA VASTA REDE DE RESPOSTAS

TUDO NA NET

ONDE O ANONIMATO É MAIS QUE MUITO

TANTO NAS CONTAS DO GOOGLE

COMO NO TWITTER